The early reviews are not promising for Star Wars Episode 3: Revenge Of The Sith. Most of the people I know who have seen it or read the adaptations that are already out there were not impressed.
I’ll reserve judgment until after I’ve seen it myself, but I’m in no hurry. However, thinking about all the negative reaction to Phantom Menace and Attack Of The Clones, and listening to some stuff I unearthed from my morning show in 1999 about the release of Menace, I have to ask myself…were the Star Wars prequels doomed before they were even finished?
I know most of you don’t give a shit about this sort of thing, but for the rest of you….
Let’s examine what these movies had against them from the beginning.
1. We already know the ending,
I know that I’ve often said that you can’t ruin a movie or book for me…sometimes I want to know how it ends so I can chart the progress of the plot. But I’m weird; I know that most people want to be on edge, wondering how things work out. That’s where the first trilogy (well, mostly Empire, but to a lesser degree New Hope) did so well. You never knew what was coming next. And the last 30 minutes of Empire set up so many cliffhangers that you absolutely had to see the next movie to see how it all ended.
This time out, we know how everything ends. All the Jedi except Yoda and Obi-Wan/Ben die. Anakin kills everything that moves. He’s disfigured, and stuck in the ultimate bondage outfit. The Emperor succeeds in seizing ultimate power. Anakin’s two children are sent into hiding to keep them safe. We knew all of this in 1977! Someone could sit out the prequel trilogy completely and not miss a damn thing. There is no compelling need to see how things work out. Thus, a lot of people who didn’t like Phantom Menace could safely sit out Clones. And out of those that were left, a number that didn’t like Episode II won’t feel the need to see Episode III. After all, we know how it ends.
To pull a Gene Siskel (as likes to call it when someone says the movie would have been better if it had been a completely different movie), this same story could have worked very well if Lucas hadn’t jumped back. Let’s imagine that we’ve moved 20-30 years into the future. Luke and Leia have rebuilt the Jedi Knights, and a child shows signs of being some prophesied great one. To top it all off, it’s either Luke’s or Leia’s son! We follow him as he struggles with the power he controls, and watch with fear as he drifts towards the dark side. Even if they were identical scripts for the three movies, except for changing some character names and substituting someone else for Yoda, we would be sitting on the edge of our seats wondering how it would end. And we’d probably hail them as great films!
2. Villains don’t make good heroes
Anyone who has seen the original trilogy knows that Darth Vader is not an anti-hero. He is a villain, the “black hat” variety of villain appropriately enough. Pure evil. True, he kills the Emperor at the end of Jedi, but that’s not a heroic act; it’s a redemptive act and there’s a major difference. Darth Vader is nothing more nor less than a villain.
Now, let’s examine the man who would become Vader: Anakin Skywalker. Even leaving out the crappy writing and the horrific acting by Jake Lloyd that turned off a lot of people, Anakin is not a sympathetic character. He lets power go to his head. He slaughters an entire village in revenge for his mommy. He’s a total dick, and the only way we could move the story forward is to have Amidala have a thing for bad boys. He’s not an anti-hero, he’s a schmuck!
Again, to pull a Siskel, the real hero of this trilogy should have been Obi-Wan or Qui-Gon. The entire story should have been told from the point of view of the teacher who has to slap down his protege when he goes bad. It would have been a classic tragic hero situation. But Lucas chose to focus on Anakin/Vader because he’s the only character that spans all six parts, and thus we are stuck with an unsympathetic protagonist.
3. The “Big Shoes” Phenomenon.
The classic trilogy were the quintessential Hero’s Journey. (Google that if you don’t know what I’m talking about.) Sure, it was a little hokey and the dialogue was corny, but it was a classic tale and very well plotted. Plus, the first Star Wars completely changed people’s perceptions of science fiction and fantasy films. The special effects completely blew away everything that had been done up to that point, and set a new benchmark that we expected all SFX movies to live up to.
After those first three movies, we had some pretty lofty ideas about what to expect from Star Wars. When the prequel trilogy was announced, we were expecting an epic story and breathtaking, groundbreaking, new SFX. We didn’t really get either out of Phantom Menace, so a lot of us felt let down and disillusioned.
To use another parallel from Sci-Fi, let’s look at the Star Trek franchise. The first series was groundbreaking. The Next Generation relaunched the basic formula with better-formed characters and new effects. Deep Space Nine gave us some of the most well-rounded characters ever in sci-fi TV (some even say any dramatic TV) and note-perfect storytelling. We had come to expect a lot out of Star Trek. And then, we got Voyager, with its cardboard characters, contrived plots, lack of meaningful conflict, and poor storytelling. Millions of fans were disillusioned. And by the time Enterprise launched, most of the fans were gone. Plus, prequels don’t work. See #1 above.
4. Anticipation
A lot of fans thought Jedi was a let-down. Third acts tend to be, to be honest, because you’re catching the balls you threw into the air in the first two acts. But we only had to wait three years for it. Now imagine if ten years had passed between Empire and Jedi. Our anticipation would have built to a fever pitch and the let-down would have been worse.
We waited sixteen years for Phantom Menace, We kept waiting and waiting and waiting, and by the time the new movie came out, our expectations were so high and our eagerness so keen that absolutely nothing would have satisfied us. A new Star Wars movie had become a Holy Grail; read the Arthurian legends to find out what happens when you find what you’ve been questing for for ages.
Think about what would have happened if The Phantom Menace, with appropriately scaled down effects, had been released in 1986. It wouldn’t have been a big big hit, but we wouldn’t have been as disappointed.
Don’t believe me? Try turning off your brain and re-watch Phantom Menace. Forget that we know all these characters and how the story ends. It’s a passable film; not great, but passable. If it didn’t have Star Wars Episode I in front of the title, and everyone’s preconceptions, it might have launched a successful franchise. As it ended up, it killed an already successful franchise because someone [cough, Lucas, cough] fell afoul of those four major principles, and killed the golden goose.
Recent Comments