Monthly Archive for September, 2009

“90% of people get this wrong….” including the people who created it.

This is a teaser for an “IQ test” on Facebook:

Image

First off, the colors are irrelevant (actually, they’re meant to be a distraction, I assume) so let’s get rid of them:

Image

If we count each of the individual squares, there are six.

They also, all together, form a rectangle for seven:

Image

There are also three individual vertical rectangles:

ImageImageImage

…bringing us to ten.

We can also create two more squares:

Image

Image

…bringing us to twelve.

Now let’s move on to horizontal rectangles. We have two 1×3:

Image

Image

…for fourteen, and four 1×2:

ImageImageImageImage

…for 18.

There are no other four-sided combinations possible. You can create more six-siders and more eight-siders, but no more four-siders. So the answer is 18.

But what are our options again?

Image

Now, if you want to count the colors in the original diagram as being significant, then you can only form eight four-siders from it. (One full rectangle around the squares, six individual squares, and one blue rectangle.) But eight isn’t an option, either, so the colors have to be insignificant.

So it would appear that if “90% of people” really get that question wrong, then the people who created the quiz have to be among them.

Episode 2 – September 20, 2009

Pab is joined at the virtual round table by Kris Leeds, Brett Fauver, and cartoonist Corey Pandolph.

Topics discussed include the Celebrity Rapture, comings and goings on television, religious discrimination against Jedis, Jonah Goldberg’s blurring the lines between reality and Star Trek, pot that doesn’t get you high, and several others. Also, the nominations for “Asshole Of The Week.”

The show this week runs one hour and five minutes, and can be downloaded by clicking here. The RSS feed for the weekly podcast can be subscribed to here.

Comment on this week’s show is welcomed either through this blog post or via E-Mail.

Crazy question: could the NJ/PA/DE toll bridges be Unconstitutional?

One of the lesser looked at parts of the Constitution:

Article I, Section 9.

No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one state over those of another: nor shall vessels bound to, or from, one state, be obliged to enter, clear or pay duties in another.

Think about that: it’s against the Constitution to require “vessels” to pay duties to enter another state. Well, that’s exactly what happens here in New Jersey.

The only ways to cross from New Jersey into Pennsylvania or Delaware, two of the three states that it borders, is to pay a duty (toll) to enter those states. There is no corresponding duty to enter New Jersey from either of those states, only to leave New Jersey and enter Pennsylvania or Delaware.

Every road from New Jersey into Pennsylvania goes over a toll bridge, except for the express connector between the New Jersey and Pennsylvania Turnpikes, which requires entering a Pennsylvania toll road as soon as you’ve crossed the state line. These duties range from 50 cents (up at the Delaware Water Gap, but I haven’t checked that toll in years so as far as I know it could be $1 or $2 now) to $4 to enter Philadelphia.

It seems to me that Article 1, Section 9, suggests that the States of Pennsylvania and Delaware are in blatant violation of the Constitution. There must be at least one road between Pennsylvania and New Jersey that can be traversed without paying a duty. And the only road between New Jersey and Delaware (which uses the Delaware Memorial Bridge) must likewise be free to travel over.

Of course, no one is going to look into this issue because the Democrats are too chickenshit, and the Republicans (who, Christ help us, are soon going to control New Jersey) don’t give a shit about the Constitution except when it protects their personal interests.

I made some home schoolers very mad today.

There is a very hot discussion going on over on Democratic Underground about home schooled kids. To be specific, the question that was raised was “would you hire someone who was home schooled?”

I answered the question very bluntly, and very truthfully.

I said “no.”

There are some very simple reasons I won’t hire a home-schooled kid, and whether you want to believe it or not, none of them have to do with the fact that the overwhelming majority of home-schooled kids today are that way because their Fundamentalist wacko parents don’t want them to be taught that the Earth is a day older than 6,000 years or that Adam and Eve didn’t ride dinosaurs. My reason for not being willing to hire a home-schooled kid has a very logical, religion-neutral basis.

To be honest, if your kid is home schooled, then I as a (hypothetical) potential employer have no independent, certifiable, verifiable way of knowing that your kid learned anything at all.

You see, when you graduate high school, you get a diploma. That’s an actual certification that you learned a certain minimal amount of information required to get that piece of paper. If you take the GED, then that’s a certification that you know a reasonable amount of what someone who went through high school knows.

However, if you were home schooled through high school, then all I have to vouch for your knowledge is, essentially, a note from your mom.

You see, home schooling has no standards. In the vast majority of areas it has no oversight. For all I know, your “home schooling” could essentially have just been a visit to Father Guido Sarducci’s Five Minute University. I have no way of knowing that you actually gained the basic knowledge that you are going to need to fulfill the basic requirements of any job.

There’s also the socialization matter. In schools, even the most exclusive private schools, kids are still forced to interact and deal with people who are not “like them.” They are exposed to different ideas, different viewpoints, and different ways of handling problems. We are an imitative species, just like our monkey brethren. (Which some of you might not have learned about in your “home schools.”) When a kid doesn’t get to socialize and interact with people not like him* he loses one of the most important skills he’s going to need in the real world. We learn early on, and sometimes painfully, how to properly react to people we don’t have things in common with or perhaps don’t like. When you homeschool your kids, you’re wrapping them in a little cocoon and when they have to deal with an obstreperous manager or customer they might not be ready to handle it.

Now, I will say that I will hire a home-”schooled” kid who managed to get accepted to (and hopefully graduate from) a University. Again, college transcripts are, to me, in the same category as the high school diplomas that your home schooled kids won’t have. It’s an impartial, independent, certification that you know something. Or, at least, that you should. Someone in a position to truly evaluate your knowledge and skills has given it their blessing. That’s fine.

So, if you’re home-”schooling” your kids, I personally think you’re doing them a disservice, but it’s your right. But don’t ask me to hire them without making them take the GED or some form of independent testing to prove that you actually taught them something real.

*One thing you might not learn in a home “school,” and to be honest not enough people learn in real school, is that the proper way to refer to someone of indeterminate gender in English is to use the masculine. It’s not sexist, it’s not “antiquated,” it’s the way the bloody language works. Deal with it.

I shouldn’t find this amusing, but I do.

http://glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com/